Ticon vs detectors: accuracy first!

Updated: Dec 13, 2018


The field study is based on direct comparison of the results of Ticon’s calculation and traffic detectors measurements. All discrepancies have been checked by video surveillance and judged accordingly.

Intersection PRFN-NMKN


Video registration has shown traffic volume at 9-30AM as 1625 veh/h.

Ticon proven accuracy is 85.1% for this measurement.

Detector is malfunctioning


Ticon vs Traffic detector’s judgement performed with the use of video surveillance camera

Judgement: Ticon results for traffic volume calculation during this test have shown 94.6% accuracy.

Recent Posts

See All

Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on City Traffic

Educated sources optimistically declare that autonomous vehicles (AV) could solve traffic problems by driving more efficiently and coordinating with other vehicles and infrastructure. While efficient

DISCLAIMER: The traffic data accessible at our website, including but not limited to trial version interactive maps, is provided for demonstration purposes only and is not intended for any kind of traffic analysis or forecasting. Ticon shall not be responsible for any unauthorized attempts by any parties to make use of any information provided at any part of the company website for any purposes outside of getting acquainted with the applications of our technology. For commercial use of Ticon products contact us. All articles, data, diagrams, tables and references are proprietary information of Ticon and shall not be reprinted without prior written authorization by the company officials.

© 2019 Ticon, Inc.